|
IAN MORTIMER |
||||
|
|
|
|||
History in Education - a further noteI was in the local shop, a small supermarket in the small town where I live (about 800 houses). The chap in front of me in the queue for the till, whom I know only by sight, was buying several items. His hands were full and he couldn't reach to put his PIN into the credit/debit card reader.
I found this little exchange very interesting. The customer has a son in the same class as my youngest son, so I think he's about the same age as me (41). The cashier was a little younger, probably mid-thirties. But despite the passage of more than twenty years since their last history lesson they retain this sense that the subject is so incredibly boring that they could never go to a talk about history, even when they do not have to travel more than a few hundred yards. A few years of uncomfortable lessons have left them with nothing but a deep prejudice against the subject, and thus against the understanding of mankind in any other time but the present.
Having written an essay recently, History in Education, stating why I could not support the proposal that history should be compulsory in secondary schools to the age of sixteen, this exchange had resonance for me. I do think compulsory history lessons are likely to alienate a number of people permanently. It's a pity. History is like sex - you must discover how wonderful it is for yourself; you shouldn't be forced to undergo it against your will; and it is shallow and meaningless when it is second-rate. Ian Mortimer
|
|
|||
Homepage > Notes and Essays > History in Education - a further note